We found results for “”
CVE-2026-26994
Good to know:
Date: February 18, 2026
Description Before version 1.7.0, utls did not implement the TLS 1.3 downgrade protection mechanism specified in RFC 8446 Section 4.1.3 when using a utls ClientHello spec. This allowed an active network adversary to downgrade TLS 1.3 connections initiated by a utls client to a lower TLS version (e.g., TLS 1.2) by modifying the ClientHello message to exclude the SupportedVersions extension, causing the server to respond with a TLS 1.2 ServerHello (along with a downgrade canary in the ServerHello random field). Because utls did not check the downgrade canary in the ServerHello random field, clients would accept the downgraded connection without detecting the attack. This attack could also be used by an active network attacker to fingerprint utls connections. Fix Commit or Pull Request refraction-networking/utls#337, specifically refraction-networking/utls@f8892761e2a4d29054264651d3a86fda83bc83f9 References - https://github.com/refraction-networking/utls/issues/181
Severity Score
Related Resources (7)
Severity Score
Weakness Type (CWE)
Protection Mechanism Failure
CWE-693Top Fix
Upgrade Version
Upgrade to version https://github.com/refraction-networking/utls.git - v1.7.0
CVSS v3.1
| Base Score: |
|
|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV): | NETWORK |
| Attack Complexity (AC): | LOW |
| Privileges Required (PR): | NONE |
| User Interaction (UI): | NONE |
| Scope (S): | UNCHANGED |
| Confidentiality (C): | LOW |
| Integrity (I): | LOW |
| Availability (A): | NONE |
Vulnerabilities
Projects
Contact Us


