• Platform
    Ai security survey - icon mend ai native appsec platform
    Mend AppSec Take a tour of the platform
    Ai security survey - sca
    Mend SCA Decrease open source risk
    Mend sast icon
    Mend SAST Secure proprietary code 10x faster
    Ai security survey - ai
    Mend AI Secure AI powered applications
    Ai security survey - renovate
    Mend Renovate Automate dependency updates
    Expand AppSec coverage
    Ai security survey - dast icon 1 DAST Ai security survey - apis icon 1 API security Ai security survey - eol icon EOL support
    Platform Benefits
    Ai security survey - repoi icon Repo integration Scalability-icon Scalability Ai security survey - reachability icon Reachability
  • Solutions
    Ai models risk - nav bar icon
    AI app security Manage risks in AI models and agents
    Ai-red-teaming-icon-
    AI red teaming Test and secure conversational AI
    Ai security survey - ai gen code security nav bar icon 36x36 1
    AI gen code security Real-time AI code security
    Ai security survey - ai based remediation icon
    AI based remediation workflows Automate remediation with AI
    Sbom - nav bar icon
    SBOM Move from static to effective SBOMs
    Runtime-security-nav-bar-icon
    Dynamic testing Test for risks in running applications
    Code scanning - nav bar icon
    Code scanning Find and fix known vulnerabilities
    Open source license nav bar icon
    Open source security Prevent. Prioritize. Automate.
    Open source license - nav bar icon
    Open source compliance Risk management for OSS licenses
    Dependency updates - nav bar icon
    Dependency updates Reduced risk, better code
    Software supply chain - nav bar icon
    Software supply chain security Ensure build integrity
    Container security container security
    Container security Container security, simplified
  • Company
    About us - nav bar icon
    About us Who we are
    Careers nav bar icon
    Careers Join our team
    Partners - nav bar icon
    Partners Meet our partners
    Events - nav bar icon
    Events Upcoming events
    Newsroom - nav bar icon
    Newsroom The latest Mend.io news
    Contact-us nav bar icon
    Contact us Connect with us
  • Resources
    Resource center - nav bar icon
    Resource center View our latest resources
    Blog - nav bar icon
    Blog The latest AppSec news and insights
    Podcast-icon
    Podcast Insights from leading experts
    Customers - nav bar icon
    Customers View our customer case studies
    Integrations - nav bar icon
    Integrations Find your integration
    Langugages nav bar icon
    Languages Find your language
    Vulnerability database - nav bar icon
    Vulnerability database Mend.io's OSS vulnerability database
    Documentation - nav bar icon
    Documentation Product and feature documentation
    FEATURED
    Ai security survey - roi whitepaper featured image
    ROI of Automated Dependency Management with Mend Renovate Enterprise
    Ai security survey - red teaming guide featured image
    AI Red Teaming Practical Guide
    Ai security survey - featured image
    A CISO’s Guide to Securing AI from the Start
    Ai security survey - practical guide to sast white paper image
    A Practical Guide to Making the Most of your SAST Investment
    Ai security survey - icon guides

    Guides

    AI security

    Protect AI models, data, and systems

     AI red teaming

    Test for behavioral risks in conversational AI

     LLM security

    Mitigating risks and future trends

     Application security

    AppSec types, tools, and best practices

     Dependency management

    Automating dependency updates

     SCA

    Manage open source code

     SAST

    Keep source code safe

     Software bill of materials

    Improve transparency, security, and compliance

     Application security testing

    Pre-production scanning and runtime protection

     Container security

    Secure containerized applications
    See all guides
Schedule a Demo

AI security & compliance
Readiness assessment

25-question self-assessment to score AI security maturity and map compliant clauses across OWASP AIMA, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, and the EU AI Act. 

Estimated time: less than 5 minutes

Overall Progress
0 of 25 questions
Governance & Accountability
AI Inventory & Risk Identification
Security & Technical Controls
Transparency & Lifecycle Assurance
Continuous Improvement & Compliance Proof
Have you formally assigned roles and responsibilities for AI risk management?
Do you maintain an up-to-date inventory of all AI models, agents, datasets, and services (AI-BOM)?
Is every AI component tagged with ownership, business purpose, and sensitivity classification?
Do you perform threat modeling specific to AI (e.g., prompt injection, data poisoning, model theft)?
Do you conduct risk assessments before deploying new AI models or agents?
Are data sources for AI training and inference validated for quality, provenance, and appropriateness?
Do you have controls to prevent unauthorized access to AI models, prompts, and training data?
Is model output monitored for hallucinations, bias, leakage, or other unsafe behaviors?
Do you maintain audit logs for AI decisions, training events, model changes, and access?
Have you defined and communicated policies for acceptable AI use and security standards?
Are inputs and outputs validated to prevent prompt injection, jailbreaks, and data leakage?
Do you test AI systems for resilience against adversarial or red-team attacks (continuous where possible)?
Do you quantify AI weaknesses or findings with a consistent metric or score?
Is your AI risk register reviewed at a scheduled cadence by governance stakeholders?
Do you maintain model cards or equivalent documentation of model design choices, assumptions, and risks?
Are bias/fairness evaluations conducted and documented for each production AI model?
Is AI risk integrated into your broader AppSec/SDLC (gates, PR checks, CI/CD, change mgmt)?
Do you review third-party AI components for licensing, vulnerabilities, and malicious packages/models?
Do you produce periodic AI risk reports for executives or boards?
Are human oversight mechanisms defined for AI decision approval/escalation in high-impact use cases?
Do you conduct post-deployment monitoring for performance, drift, and security anomalies?
Is there a documented and tested incident response plan for AI failures or breaches?
Do you perform periodic internal audits of AI risk and compliance requirements?
Are corrective actions tracked and validated after each AI incident, assessment, or audit?
Do you publicly document your AI governance and trustworthiness commitments (e.g., transparency report)?
Previous
Next
Assessment results
Your AI security & compliance maturity report
Retake
Export
Average Score: / 4.0
Questions Answered Yes: / 25
Section Breakdown
Governance & Accountability
coverage
AI Inventory & Risk Identification
coverage
Security & Technical Controls
coverage
Transparency & Lifecycle Assurance
coverage
Continuous Improvement & Compliance Proof
coverage
Recommended Next Steps
Mend.io Solutions
See how
Gaps to Address
OWASP AI-MA
EU AI Act
ISO/IEC 42001
NIST AI RMF
Access Control
Asset Mapping
Asset Metadata
Audit
Audit & Logging
Behavioral Monitoring
Bias & Fairness Testing
Corrective Actions
Data Quality & Provenance §3.1
Explainability
Governance
Governance & Policies
Governance Reporting
Governance Review
Human Oversight
IR & Containment
Lifecycle Security
Operational Monitoring
Prompt Security
Risk Assessment
Supply Chain §2.4
Testing §4 (Red Teaming)
Threat Modeling §2.2
Transparency
Validation §3.1
Vulnerability Classification
Annex IV (Technical Documentation)
Article 10
Article 10(2)
Article 13
Article 14
Article 15(1)
Article 15(2)
Article 15(3)
Article 15(4)
Article 17
Article 19
Article 9
Article 9(2)
Article 9(3)
Annex A.7
Clause 10.2
Clause 10.3
Clause 5.2
Clause 5.3
Clause 6.1
Clause 6.2
Clause 6.3
Clause 8.1
Clause 8.2
Clause 8.3
Clause 8.4
Clause 8.5
Clause 9.1
Clause 9.2
Clause 9.3
GOVERN 1.1
GOVERN 1.2
GOVERN 1.4
GOVERN 2.2
GOVERN 3.1
GOVERN 3.3
GOVERN 3.4
GOVERN 4.1
MANAGE 1.3
MANAGE 1.4
MANAGE 2.1
MANAGE 2.4
MANAGE 3.1
MANAGE 3.3
MAP 1.2
MAP 1.3
MAP 2.2
MEASURE 1.1
MEASURE 2.2
MEASURE 2.3
MEASURE 3.2
No gaps - fully compliant!
Learn more
OWASP AI-MA
Access Control
Asset Mapping
Asset Metadata
Audit
Audit & Logging
Behavioral Monitoring
Bias & Fairness Testing
Corrective Actions
Data Quality & Provenance §3.1
Explainability
Governance
Governance & Policies
Governance Reporting
Governance Review
Human Oversight
IR & Containment
Lifecycle Security
Operational Monitoring
Prompt Security
Risk Assessment
Supply Chain §2.4
Testing §4 (Red Teaming)
Threat Modeling §2.2
Transparency
Validation §3.1
Vulnerability Classification
No gaps - fully compliant!
EU AI Act
Annex IV (Technical Documentation)
Article 10
Article 10(2)
Article 13
Article 14
Article 15(1)
Article 15(2)
Article 15(3)
Article 15(4)
Article 17
Article 19
Article 9
Article 9(2)
Article 9(3)
No gaps - fully compliant!
ISO/IEC 42001
Annex A.7
Clause 10.2
Clause 10.3
Clause 5.2
Clause 5.3
Clause 6.1
Clause 6.2
Clause 6.3
Clause 8.1
Clause 8.2
Clause 8.3
Clause 8.4
Clause 8.5
Clause 9.1
Clause 9.2
Clause 9.3
No gaps - fully compliant!
NIST AI RMF
GOVERN 1.1
GOVERN 1.2
GOVERN 1.4
GOVERN 2.2
GOVERN 3.1
GOVERN 3.3
GOVERN 3.4
GOVERN 4.1
MANAGE 1.3
MANAGE 1.4
MANAGE 2.1
MANAGE 2.4
MANAGE 3.1
MANAGE 3.3
MAP 1.2
MAP 1.3
MAP 2.2
MEASURE 1.1
MEASURE 2.2
MEASURE 2.3
MEASURE 3.2
No gaps - fully compliant!
Compliant Clauses
OWASP AI-MA
EU AI Act
ISO/IEC 42001
NIST AI RMF
Access Control
Asset Mapping
Asset Metadata
Audit
Audit & Logging
Behavioral Monitoring
Bias & Fairness Testing
Corrective Actions
Data Quality & Provenance §3.1
Explainability
Governance
Governance & Policies
Governance Reporting
Governance Review
Human Oversight
IR & Containment
Lifecycle Security
Operational Monitoring
Prompt Security
Risk Assessment
Supply Chain §2.4
Testing §4 (Red Teaming)
Threat Modeling §2.2
Transparency
Validation §3.1
Vulnerability Classification
Annex IV (Technical Documentation)
Article 10
Article 10(2)
Article 13
Article 14
Article 15(1)
Article 15(2)
Article 15(3)
Article 15(4)
Article 17
Article 19
Article 9
Article 9(2)
Article 9(3)
Annex A.7
Clause 10.2
Clause 10.3
Clause 5.2
Clause 5.3
Clause 6.1
Clause 6.2
Clause 6.3
Clause 8.1
Clause 8.2
Clause 8.3
Clause 8.4
Clause 8.5
Clause 9.1
Clause 9.2
Clause 9.3
GOVERN 1.1
GOVERN 1.2
GOVERN 1.4
GOVERN 2.2
GOVERN 3.1
GOVERN 3.3
GOVERN 3.4
GOVERN 4.1
MANAGE 1.3
MANAGE 1.4
MANAGE 2.1
MANAGE 2.4
MANAGE 3.1
MANAGE 3.3
MAP 1.2
MAP 1.3
MAP 2.2
MEASURE 1.1
MEASURE 2.2
MEASURE 2.3
MEASURE 3.2
No compliant clauses yet
Learn more
OWASP AI-MA
Access Control
Asset Mapping
Asset Metadata
Audit
Audit & Logging
Behavioral Monitoring
Bias & Fairness Testing
Corrective Actions
Data Quality & Provenance §3.1
Explainability
Governance
Governance & Policies
Governance Reporting
Governance Review
Human Oversight
IR & Containment
Lifecycle Security
Operational Monitoring
Prompt Security
Risk Assessment
Supply Chain §2.4
Testing §4 (Red Teaming)
Threat Modeling §2.2
Transparency
Validation §3.1
Vulnerability Classification
No gaps - fully compliant!
EU AI Act
Annex IV (Technical Documentation)
Article 10
Article 10(2)
Article 13
Article 14
Article 15(1)
Article 15(2)
Article 15(3)
Article 15(4)
Article 17
Article 19
Article 9
Article 9(2)
Article 9(3)
No gaps - fully compliant!
ISO/IEC 42001
Annex A.7
Clause 10.2
Clause 10.3
Clause 5.2
Clause 5.3
Clause 6.1
Clause 6.2
Clause 6.3
Clause 8.1
Clause 8.2
Clause 8.3
Clause 8.4
Clause 8.5
Clause 9.1
Clause 9.2
Clause 9.3
No gaps - fully compliant!
NIST AI RMF
GOVERN 1.1
GOVERN 1.2
GOVERN 1.4
GOVERN 2.2
GOVERN 3.1
GOVERN 3.3
GOVERN 3.4
GOVERN 4.1
MANAGE 1.3
MANAGE 1.4
MANAGE 2.1
MANAGE 2.4
MANAGE 3.1
MANAGE 3.3
MAP 1.2
MAP 1.3
MAP 2.2
MEASURE 1.1
MEASURE 2.2
MEASURE 2.3
MEASURE 3.2
No gaps - fully compliant!

© 2026 Mend.io (White Source Ltd.) All rights reserved.

Ai security survey - checkmark

AI Security & Compliance Assessment

Map your maturity against the global standards. Receive a personalized readiness report in under 5 minutes.

Get your score

Get your results

including a compliance readiness snapshot